Red and Green Indicators: A New Perspective on Glaucoma

In the latest episode of his insightful podcast, Dr. Chris Lievens tackles the complexities and misconceptions surrounding red and green indicators. Titled “Red and Green Indicators: A New Perspective on Glaucoma,” this episode offers valuable insights for new and experienced optometrists, optometry students, and anyone interested in optometry. Dr. Andrew Rixon, a VA optometrist with extensive experience in ocular disease management and SPECTRALIS® usage, joins Dr. Lievens.

In Partnership with Heidelberg Engineering

Image is courtesy of Heidelberg Engineering

The Potential Pitfall of Red and Green Indicators

The central theme of the discussion is the potential confusion caused by red and green indicators on scans, which are commonly misunderstood. These indicators suggest abnormality (red) and normalcy (green), but this is not always true. The traditional interpretation of these colors can lead to misdiagnoses if not carefully considered in the broader clinical context. This article aims to highlight the importance of examining scans purposefully to avoid misinterpretations and ensure accurate diagnosis and treatment.

The Importance of Examining Raw Data

Dr. Rixon emphasizes the significance of looking at raw data and segmentation quality on Heidelberg Engineering SPECTRALIS® OCT scan. He advises focusing on tissue reflectivity and the accuracy of the captured data, moving beyond the basic printouts of early OCTs to more sophisticated analysis. Additionally, he discusses the impact of centration and potential disruptors such as tear film and vitreous in obtaining high-quality scans. This detailed approach ensures that clinicians are not misled by the seemingly straightforward red and green indicators but instead base their diagnoses on a comprehensive scan data analysis.

Evaluating Glaucoma Patients

Dr. Rixon shares his approach to evaluating scans for glaucoma patients, whether new or established. He first examines the clinical assessment of the nerve and uses the Heidelberg Engineering SPECTRALIS® OCT as a confirmatory tool. He also looks at the macular data and combines it with the RNFL (retinal nerve fiber layer) data to get a topographically consistent defect indicative of glaucoma. This thorough approach ensures that the clinician has a robust understanding of the patient’s condition before making treatment decisions.

Dr. Rixon’s methodology involves a step-by-step evaluation, starting with assessing the quality of the scan. He looks for segmentation errors and checks for disruptions in the data caused by factors like the tear film or vitreous. He can trust the subsequent analysis by ensuring that the scan data is of high quality. Once the quality is confirmed, he examines the nerve fiber layer and the macular data, looking for consistent patterns that indicate glaucoma.

Managing Diagnosed Glaucoma Patients

The conversation includes valuable insights on managing patients diagnosed with glaucoma but showing no progression. Dr. Rixon and Dr. Lievens stress the need for a holistic and patient-centric approach. They advocate for a data-driven strategy, using trends over time rather than isolated events to make clinical decisions. This approach is particularly important in glaucoma management, where the disease progresses slowly, and small changes can be significant.

For patients showing no progression, balancing the need for ongoing monitoring with the patient’s quality of life is crucial. Over-treatment can lead to unnecessary side effects and patient anxiety, while under-treatment can allow the disease to progress unchecked. By carefully tracking trends over time and using comprehensive data analysis, clinicians can make informed decisions that optimize patient outcomes.

heidelberg engineering

The Challenge of Red and Green Indicators

Dr. Lievens and Dr. Rixon highlight the critical point of understanding red and green indicators on scans as probabilities rather than definitive diagnoses. They explain that these colors represent statistical likelihoods based on normative databases and do not provide an absolute assessment of the patient’s condition. This understanding requires clinicians to look beyond the colors and interpret the data within the context of each patient’s unique clinical presentation.

Dr. Rixon shares examples of how red and green indicators can be misleading. A scan showing a red area might prompt immediate concern. Still, if the overall data quality is poor or there are segmentation errors, that red area might not indicate true pathology. Conversely, a scan with predominantly green areas might lead to complacency, but subtle data changes could indicate early disease progression that needs to be addressed.

The Role of Advanced Imaging Technology in Heidelberg Engineering SPECTRALIS®

Advanced imaging technology like Heidelberg Engineering SPECTRALIS® provides clinicians with powerful tools to analyze and track glaucoma progression. Dr. Lievens and Dr. Rixon discuss the advantages of using this technology to obtain detailed, high-quality images that can be analyzed in-depth. The ability to look at raw data, adjust segmentation, and view changes over time allows for a more accurate and nuanced understanding of each patient’s condition.

They also emphasize the importance of staying updated with the latest advancements in imaging technology and continuously improving one’s skills in data interpretation. This commitment to ongoing education ensures that clinicians can make the best use of the tools available to them and provide the highest level of care to their patients.

Case Studies and Practical Applications

Throughout the podcast, Dr. Rixon shares several case studies illustrating the practical application of these principles. He describes scenarios where careful analysis of the raw data from Heidelberg Engineering SPECTRALIS® and understanding the limitations of red and green indicators led to more accurate diagnoses and better patient outcomes. These case studies highlight the importance of a thorough, data-driven approach and provide valuable insights for clinicians looking to improve their practice.

In conclusion, Dr. Lievens and Dr. Rixon urge eye care professionals to use the available technology effectively, confirm the quality of the data, and always consider the broader context of the patient’s condition. By doing so, they can avoid misdiagnoses and provide better patient care.

By understanding the nuances of red and green indicators and employing a thorough, data-driven approach, optometrists can enhance their diagnostic accuracy and improve patient outcomes in the management of glaucoma. This article underscores the importance of looking beyond simplistic interpretations and committing to a comprehensive analysis to ensure the best possible care for patients.

Christopher Lievens
Christopher Lievens
Chris Lievens is the Chief of Internal Clinics and Professor at Southern College of Optometry. Dr. Lievens has been employed in private practice, an ophthalmology referral center and he served in the United States Air Force. Dr. Lievens was the Chief of Aerospace Optometry at the Pentagon before joining SCO. Dr. Lievens is a fellow of the American Academy of Optometry and is a Region Chair of the Academy’s Admittance Committee. He is a distinguished fellow in the National Academies of Practice. Dr. Lievens is the co-creator of the fundus grading card and currently conducts research in glaucoma, dry eye, uveitis and contact lens care. Dr. Lievens has a Master’s degree in Healthcare Administration and is currently enrolled in a PhD program in Cambridge. Dr. Lievens is a member of the American Optometric Association, the British Contact Lens Association and the Association for Vision and Research in Ophthalmology.

Get in Touch


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

Latest Posts